Keyword summary
78% 9 analyzed articles/videos 10,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Holocaust results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 3,532 hits . Analysis detected 25,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,405 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (47,045 of 53,342 keywords). This Holocaust is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Holocaust
Keyword details
Total words: 41,405
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles41.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst