Author summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 2,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Felsenthal results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 565 hits . Analysis detected 5,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,539 of 9,471 authors). This Daniel Felsenthal is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Daniel Felsenthal
Author details
Total words: 8,720
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst