Author summary
25% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Layla Halilbasic results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 956 hits . Analysis detected 8,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,639 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,192 of 8,782 authors). This Layla Halilbasic is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Layla Halilbasic
Author details
Total words: 15,639
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst