Keyword summary
93% 31 analyzed articles/videos 23,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Epstein Files results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 15,752 hits . Analysis detected 111,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 81,532 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (24,739 of 51,959 keywords). This Epstein Files is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Epstein Files
Keyword details
Total words: 81,532
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score31 analyzed articles81.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst