Topic summary
18% 16 analyzed articles/videos 13,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vulnerabilities results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 3,868 hits . Analysis detected 25,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,572 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (22,891 of 23,409 topics). This Vulnerabilities is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Vulnerabilities
Topic details
Total words: 61,572
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 0.9% BS Score16 analyzed articles61.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst