Author summary
59% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Claburn results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 875 hits . Analysis detected 5,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,960 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,729 of 9,195 authors). This Thomas Claburn is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Thomas Claburn
Author details
Total words: 6,960
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.4% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst