Author summary
19% 48 analyzed articles/videos 36,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swati Khandelwal results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 7,327 hits . Analysis detected 68,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 167,026 analyzed words across 48 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (9,179 of 9,486 authors). This Swati Khandelwal is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Swati Khandelwal
Author details
Total words: 167,026
Article count: 48
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 0.8% BS Score48 analyzed articles167K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.0% 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst