Author summary
64%1 analyzed article/video927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 3,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,219 of 9,297 authors). This Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
66%Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,708
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos