Topic summary
70% 21 analyzed articles/videos 13,725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uk Politics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 10,145 hits . Analysis detected 79,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,490 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (17,027 of 23,749 topics). This Uk Politics is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Uk Politics
Topic details
Total words: 84,490
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score21 analyzed articles84.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst