Author summary
77% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Wootton-Cane results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,634 hits . Analysis detected 13,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,172 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,739 of 9,402 authors). This Nicole Wootton-Cane is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Nicole Wootton-Cane
Author details
Total words: 14,172
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst