Topic summary
64% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Odyssey results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 2,766 hits . Analysis detected 24,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,715 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (19,059 of 24,413 topics). This The Odyssey is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. The Odyssey
Topic details
Total words: 29,715
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles29.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst