Author summary
96%1 analyzed article/video387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Byron Kuhner results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Bandwagon, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 557 hits. Analysis detected 2,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (1,205 of 9,436 authors). This John Byron Kuhner is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
John Byron Kuhner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
88%John Byron Kuhner (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510087.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.0%36.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 17.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos