Topic summary
⁠71%14 analyzed articles/videos13,249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Separation Of Powers results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 9,338 hits. Analysis detected 57,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,776 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (16,705 of 23,407 topics). This Separation Of Powers is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles62.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Challenging Toxic Air Exemptions – and a Pattern of Executive Overreach on Regulatory Rollbacks⁠15%
Just Security⁠7%By Sarah Buckley⁠0%8/7/2026, 5:50:13 AM
Trump Has Revolutionized Executive Power⁠54%
Persuasion⁠45%By Francis Fukuyama⁠70%7/31/2026, 7:10:05 AM
Brown and Despathy: Outsourcing responsibility⁠57%
Vermont Daily Chronicle⁠29%By Elizabeth Brown⁠72% Alison Despathy⁠72%7/31/2026, 6:51:40 AM
Court split grows over Trump’s mandatory immigration detention policy⁠30%
Wisconsin Watch⁠16%By Paul Kiefer⁠21%7/28/2026, 3:32:08 PM
Federal Judges Chastise Trump’s Justice Department for “Unlawful,” “Unethical” and “Unseemly” Conduct⁠43%
ProPublica⁠51%By J. David McSwane⁠49%7/28/2026, 2:00:00 AM
U.S. attorney abruptly fired by Trump sues in first-of-its-kind lawsuit⁠22%
MS NOW⁠98%By Allison Detzel⁠95%7/23/2026, 4:21:36 PM
Jim Jordan: Jack Smith Alleged Snooping a ‘Total Separations of Powers Issue’⁠74%
Breitbart⁠89%By Jeff Poor⁠97%7/16/2026, 1:02:16 AM
John Roberts Again Undermines SCOTUS Legitimacy With Irreconcilable Slaughter And Cook Opinions⁠80%
The Federalist⁠94%By Ben Weingarten⁠0%7/6/2026, 4:24:51 AM
The Roberts Court and the Disappearing Congress⁠60%
Washington Monthly⁠73%By Peter M. Shane⁠0%6/30/2026, 6:39:56 PM
Trump’s quest for untrammeled power just got a big boost⁠79%
Vox⁠69%By Zack Beauchamp⁠75%6/30/2026, 1:05:00 PM