Author summary
29%1 analyzed article/video2,195 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Buckley results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 2,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,585 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,793 of 9,437 authors). This Sarah Buckley is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Sarah Buckley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
50%Sarah Buckley (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,585
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.8%8.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos