Author summary
74%9 analyzed articles/videos10,825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Beauchamp results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 7,441 hits. Analysis detected 68,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,072 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,588 of 8,782 authors). This Zack Beauchamp is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Zack Beauchamp
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
37%Zack Beauchamp (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 70,072
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles70.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate