Author summary
74% 9 analyzed articles/videos 10,825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Beauchamp results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 7,441 hits . Analysis detected 68,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,072 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,588 of 8,782 authors). This Zack Beauchamp is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Zack Beauchamp
Author details
Total words: 70,072
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles70.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst