Topic summary
96% 13 analyzed articles/videos 5,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Races results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 5,869 hits . Analysis detected 37,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,027 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (13,814 of 24,545 topics). This Senate Races is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Senate Races
Topic details
Total words: 33,027
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score13 analyzed articles33K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Horn Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst