Author summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Jacobs results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 681 hits . Analysis detected 3,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 79% (2,040 of 9,482 authors). This Emily Jacobs is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Emily Jacobs
Author details
Total words: 3,364
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.5% 12.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Author 20.2%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Horn Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst