Publication summary
78% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jewish Insider results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,352 hits . Analysis detected 11,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,182 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (277 of 565 publications). This Jewish Insider is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 16,182
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst