Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 1,590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Kassel results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 477 hits . Analysis detected 2,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,770 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,236 of 9,287 authors). This Matthew Kassel is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Matthew Kassel
Author details
Total words: 4,770
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst