Author summary
89% 23 analyzed articles/videos 8,382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Vespa results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 8,153 hits . Analysis detected 66,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,317 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,037 of 8,529 authors). This Matt Vespa is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Matt Vespa
Author details
Total words: 43,317
Article count: 23
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score23 analyzed articles43.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.8% 18.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst