Topic summary
95% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scandals results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 2,819 hits . Analysis detected 21,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,016 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,730 of 22,481 topics). This Scandals is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Scandals
Topic details
Total words: 16,016
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles16K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst