Author summary
74% 17 analyzed articles/videos 6,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Luciano results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 4,552 hits . Analysis detected 28,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,338 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,338 of 8,953 authors). This Michael Luciano is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Michael Luciano
Author details
Total words: 28,338
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score17 analyzed articles28.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.1% 16.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst