Mediaite83%

Kamala Harris Snubs Biden When Revealing Her Top Presidents: ‘And Of Course, Barak Obama…’ 22%

By Michael Luciano75%

7/31/2026, 6:07:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 485 faulty-reasoning hits from 435 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.1% and a BS Rank of 22% (24,123 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the article peer group.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris was asked to list the “most effective presidents in American history,” and her response omitted former President Joe Biden , under whom she served. 
Harris became the Democratic nominee in the summer of 2024 after Biden, who was dogged by bad poll numbers at the time, imploded during a debate against Donald Trump . 
During a rambling response about the national debt that ended with the declaration , “We finally beat Medicare.” 
Biden dropped his reelection bid three weeks later and threw his support behind Harris, who ran an abbreviated campaign using some of Biden’s campaign staffers. 
She lost both the electoral vote count and the popular vote to Trump. 
However, there is speculation that she may run again in 2028. 
On Friday night, Harris spoke at the National Urban League in New York, where President Marc Morial asked the former veep to rank her top presidents. 
“In your view, rank the top three most effective presidents in American history,” he said. 
“Oh Marc, don’t make me do that,” Harris replied, before naming Franklin Roosevelt . 
“He did some good things,” she said. 
“In fact, it was he who talked about the expansion of the Supreme Court, and then he got ferocious… blowback for that. 
Social Security. 
When I think about what he did in terms of investing in the people during dire times and talking about the role and responsibility of government, that it should not just be about the benevolence of community organizations or just interpersonal relationships. 
The government has a role. 
I think he was a very important president.” 
She went on to list John F. 
Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson . 
“I credit Kennedy, of course, in terms of what he laid the groundwork for,” Harris stated. 
“And then Johnson followed up on.” 
She later added, “And then of course, Barack Obama and what he did with the Affordable Care Act, among many things. 
But in particular, if we had one issue that’s been ailing America for generations, which is a healthcare system that has failed anyone other than the rich, and addressing the way that he did and took a lot of heat for it, I think he’s one of the greatest presidents.” 
In her book released last year, Harris wrote that Biden, who is 83, made the “reckless” decision to run again because of his “ego.” 
Watch above via C-SPAN. 
The post Kamala Harris Snubs Biden When Revealing Her Top Presidents: ‘And Of Course, Barak Obama…’ first appeared on Mediaite . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.6%Michael Luciano: 4.6%Mediaite: 4.3%Confirmation Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 3.1%Mediaite: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Michael Luciano: 6.6%Mediaite: 8.0%Framing Effect17.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.1%Michael Luciano: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.3%Status Quo Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Michael Luciano: 0.8%Mediaite: 1.3%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 6.9%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.4%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 21.8%Michael Luciano: 15.3%Mediaite: 13.3%Negativity Bias21.8%This article: 5.5%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 2.2%Mediaite: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.3%Mediaite: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Michael Luciano: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.1%Halo Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.1%Mediaite: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 4.3%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.7%Mediaite: 0.9%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 3.7%Mediaite: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.5%Michael Luciano: 5.5%Mediaite: 6.4%Hasty Generalization11.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 3.9%Mediaite: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 2.9%Mediaite: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.7%Michael Luciano: 4.5%Mediaite: 2.6%Anecdotal9.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.7%Michael Luciano: 2.3%Mediaite: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.9%Mediaite: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%Michael Luciano: 3.0%Mediaite: 3.4%Unattributed Quote3.4%This article: 3.2%Michael Luciano: 2.7%Mediaite: 2.9%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 5.8%Mediaite: 7.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 1.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.8%Mediaite: 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

435 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers56%attributed speech193writer words
Selected voice

Kamala Harris

76%flagged-word coverage
227 attributed words94% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Kamala Harris: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.