Mediaite83%

Election Forecaster Says Democrats Could Actually Flip Senate Seat in Texas Because GOP Candidate ‘Is So Awful’ 72%

By Michael Luciano75%

7/30/2026, 5:24:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Red Herring, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 992 faulty-reasoning hits from 536 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.6% and a BS Rank of 72% (8,826 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the article peer group.

This could finally be the year Democrats win a statewide race in Texas in the form of a U.S. 
Senate seat, campaign guru Larry Sabato told CNN on Thursday night. 
In November, Democratic state Rep. 
James Talarico will square off against Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton , who is dogged by a great deal of baggage. 
The attorney general was indicted on criminal state securities fraud charges in 2015, hit with federal civil fraud charges in 2016, accused by former staff members of taking bribes, impeached by the Republican-controlled Texas House of Representatives, accused of adultery by his wife, and has been accused of abusing his office to help a friend and donor, who reportedly employed Paxton’s mistress as a favor. 
His office has also come under fire for cutting a plea deal with a disgraced former lawyer who was charged with repeatedly sexually abusing a young boy from ages eight to 10. 
Sabato, who is the director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, has offered his  Sabato’s Crystal Ball  analysis for years. 
He joined Thursday’s OutFront on CNN, where Erin Burnett pointed to a newly released Fox News poll showing Talarico leading Paxton 51% to 48%. 
“So, let me ask you about this poll that just came in here while we were talking in the past few minutes from Fox, Larry,” Burnett said. 
“The Republican Senate candidate, Ken Paxton, is now trailing the Democrat, James Talarico, in Texas. 
Ok, Texas. 
This is the first public poll where either candidate has hit the 50% mark. 
Ok. 
It’s Texas. 
It’s an incredible thing to see this. 
It’s also the end of July. 
Where do you see that race going?” 
Sabato replied by noting that for many election cycles, Democrats have expressed optimism about winning a statewide race in Texas, which has not happened since 1994 . 
However, Sabato said, this might be the year because “Paxton is so awful”: 
I’ve been around a long time. 
And since 1994, I’ve gotten call after call virtually every day from Texans in politics on the Democratic side, saying, “This is the year. 
We’re finally gonna do it.” 
But you know what? 
I’m starting to believe it’s actually possible this year, not just because James Talarico is a great candidate, which he is, but Paxton is so awful. 
And I’m sorry to use that word. 
But, you know, we used to have a word, a flaunter, meaning he’s a sinner who flaunts the sin. 
And that pretty much has been the way Paxton has conducted his public career. 
A lot of these donors won’t touch him. 
Notice, he’s not doing well at all raising money. 
It’s because they have family and friends and businesses to protect, and they really don’t want to identify themselves publicly with a candidate who has Paxton’s record. 
Paxton defeated Sen. 
John Cornyn in the Republican primary runoff after President Donald Trump endorsed the attorney general 
Watch above via CNN. 
The post Election Forecaster Says Democrats Could Actually Flip Senate Seat in Texas Because GOP Candidate ‘Is So Awful’ first appeared on Mediaite . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.9%Michael Luciano: 4.6%Mediaite: 4.3%Confirmation Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Michael Luciano: 3.1%Mediaite: 3.3%Availability Heuristic10.6%This article: 5.0%Michael Luciano: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Michael Luciano: 6.6%Mediaite: 8.0%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.0%Michael Luciano: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.3%Status Quo Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Michael Luciano: 0.8%Mediaite: 1.3%Optimism Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 45.1%Michael Luciano: 15.3%Mediaite: 13.3%Negativity Bias45.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Michael Luciano: 2.2%Mediaite: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error5.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.3%Mediaite: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.1%Mediaite: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 2.2%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 2.6%Michael Luciano: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 29.3%Michael Luciano: 4.3%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem29.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.7%Mediaite: 0.9%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.1%Michael Luciano: 3.7%Mediaite: 3.1%Appeal to Authority1.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%Michael Luciano: 5.5%Mediaite: 6.4%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 12.1%Michael Luciano: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring12.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.2%Michael Luciano: 3.9%Mediaite: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 2.4%Michael Luciano: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.4%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 1.7%Michael Luciano: 2.9%Mediaite: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.9%Michael Luciano: 4.5%Mediaite: 2.6%Anecdotal6.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.5%Michael Luciano: 2.3%Mediaite: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 0.9%Mediaite: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.5%Michael Luciano: 3.0%Mediaite: 3.4%Unattributed Quote4.5%This article: 6.9%Michael Luciano: 2.7%Mediaite: 2.9%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 7.1%Michael Luciano: 5.8%Mediaite: 7.1%Biased Writer Voice7.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.9%Mediaite: 1.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Luciano: 1.8%Mediaite: 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Michael Luciano: 1.7%Mediaite: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

536 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers43%attributed speech305writer words
Selected voice

Larry Sabato

98%flagged-word coverage
189 attributed words82% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.5 ptsWriter: 12.5%Larry Sabato: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Larry Sabato: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Larry Sabato: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.0 ptsWriter: 7.9%Larry Sabato: 6.9%6.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.