Topic summary
68% 23 analyzed articles/videos 20,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurants results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 4,665 hits . Analysis detected 55,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 78,546 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (19,220 of 22,393 topics). This Restaurants is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Restaurants
Topic details
Total words: 78,546
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score23 analyzed articles78.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst