Author summary
⁠23%6 analyzed articles/videos1,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Hopkins results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 3,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,638 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (7,858 of 8,804 authors). This Sarah Hopkins is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Sarah Hopkins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠11%Sarah Hopkins (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,638
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos