Topic summary
78% 12 analyzed articles/videos 8,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Actions results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 5,465 hits . Analysis detected 38,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,568 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (15,148 of 24,545 topics). This Presidential Actions is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Presidential Actions
Topic details
Total words: 38,568
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score12 analyzed articles38.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst