Author summary
75% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Banco results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 677 hits . Analysis detected 3,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,036 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,334 of 9,295 authors). This Erin Banco is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Erin Banco
Author details
Total words: 4,036
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst