Topic summary
54% 17 analyzed articles/videos 16,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Market results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 4,939 hits . Analysis detected 43,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 66,112 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (20,372 of 22,761 topics). This Oil Market is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Oil Market
Topic details
Total words: 66,112
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score17 analyzed articles66.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst