Author summary
41%3 analyzed articles/videos1,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mick Akers results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 456 hits. Analysis detected 2,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,000 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 25% (6,809 of 9,056 authors). This Mick Akers is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Mick Akers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
25%Mick Akers (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,000
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate