Topic summary
â 93% 30 analyzed articles/videos 17,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Proliferation results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 11,989 hits . Analysis detected 98,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 98,107 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 33% (16,074 of 23,966 topics). This Nuclear Proliferation is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Nuclear Proliferation
Topic details
Total words: 98,107
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score30 analyzed articles98.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst