Author summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 1,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel E. Zoughbie results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 422 hits . Analysis detected 4,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,542 of 9,471 authors). This Daniel E. Zoughbie is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Daniel E. Zoughbie
Author details
Total words: 4,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst