Topic summary
50% 11 analyzed articles/videos 5,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Power results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 2,011 hits . Analysis detected 16,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,828 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (20,759 of 24,545 topics). This Nuclear Power is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group. Nuclear Power
Topic details
Total words: 27,828
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles27.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst