Author summary
74% 13 analyzed articles/videos 6,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neetika Walter results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 4,523 hits . Analysis detected 23,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,748 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,621 of 8,623 authors). This Neetika Walter is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Neetika Walter
Author details
Total words: 26,748
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score13 analyzed articles26.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.9% 16.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.7%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst