Author summary
61%2 analyzed articles/videos1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ameya Paleja results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 3,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,528 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (2,372 of 8,946 authors). This Ameya Paleja is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Ameya Paleja
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
74%Ameya Paleja (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,528
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 16.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate