Publication summary
3% 12 analyzed articles/videos 20,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cardinal News results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 2,029 hits . Analysis detected 23,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,440 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (541 of 548 publications). This Cardinal News is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 84,440
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 0.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles84.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst