Author summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghan Mangrum results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 1,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (6,308 of 8,541 authors). This Meghan Mangrum is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Meghan Mangrum
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠27%Meghan Mangrum (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,200
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos