Topic summary
91% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Netflix results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 4,411 hits . Analysis detected 30,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,519 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (15,625 of 24,545 topics). This Netflix is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Netflix
Topic details
Total words: 31,519
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles31.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst