Topic summary
87%13 analyzed articles/videos6,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meta results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 4,297 hits. Analysis detected 29,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,516 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (16,272 of 22,816 topics). This Meta is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score13 analyzed articles31.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Google Earth's new AI image generation function didn't survive a day after users deepfaked disasters35%
Business Insider42%By Katherine Li28%7/31/2026, 1:55:11 PM
After backlash, Meta pauses plan to ‘rate limit’ its smart glasses41%
The Verge70%By Sean Hollister69%7/24/2026, 3:27:46 PM
Meta launches new Facebook Verified badge for actual, real humans57%
Engadget64%By Mat Smith47%7/24/2026, 4:43:00 AM
I wore Meta's $499 prescription Ray-Bans for 6 weeks: They're stylish but not for me11%
ZDNET67%By Adam Doud81%7/20/2026, 5:00:33 PM
Meta Is Reportedly Considering A Multibillion-Dollar Data Center Deal With Anthropic30%
Engadget64%By Karissa Bell41%7/17/2026, 1:51:05 PM
Is rare bacteria in Wyoming city's water linked to Meta data center? What we know33%
Snopes.com20%By Jack Izzo15%7/16/2026, 9:00:09 PM
Meta Sued For Allegedly Using Discriminatory AI In Layoff Decisions57%
Gizmodo75%By Ece Yildirim88%7/14/2026, 5:38:21 PM
Destroying the Privacy LED on Meta Smart Glasses Will No Longer Enable Creepiness72%
Gizmodo75%By Mike Pearl83%7/8/2026, 2:00:25 AM
Mark Zuckerberg tells staff that AI agents haven’t progressed as quickly as he’d hoped59%
TechCrunch70%By Lucas Ropek48%7/2/2026, 4:38:10 PM
I Have Thoughts About That Kylie Jenner Meta Glasses Ad80%
404 Media67%By Samantha Cole75%6/30/2026, 11:19:17 AM