Author summary
75% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Cole results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 3,171 hits . Analysis detected 28,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,292 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,829 of 9,205 authors). This Samantha Cole is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Samantha Cole
Author details
Total words: 29,292
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score12 analyzed articles29.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst