Author summary
83% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Pearl results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 2,988 hits . Analysis detected 16,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,385 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,718 of 8,708 authors). This Mike Pearl is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Mike Pearl
Author details
Total words: 13,385
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.3% 22.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst