Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Doud results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 885 hits . Analysis detected 4,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,369 of 9,471 authors). This Adam Doud is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Adam Doud
Author details
Total words: 5,748
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.4% 15.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst