Topic summary
90% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Market results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,671 hits . Analysis detected 27,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,134 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (18,969 of 23,651 topics). This Labor Market is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Labor Market
Topic details
Total words: 35,134
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles35.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst