Author summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aldo Svaldi results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 92 hits . Analysis detected 453 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,593 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,655 of 9,481 authors). This Aldo Svaldi is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Aldo Svaldi
Author details
Total words: 1,593
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 3.6% 3.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst