Topic summary
91% 7 analyzed articles/videos 8,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Criminal Court results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 6,329 hits . Analysis detected 43,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,867 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (12,897 of 24,493 topics). This International Criminal Court is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. International Criminal Court
Topic details
Total words: 35,867
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles35.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst