Author summary
79%2 analyzed articles/videos8,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Tracey results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 4,871 hits. Analysis detected 25,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,957 of 8,956 authors). This Michael Tracey is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Michael Tracey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
45%Michael Tracey (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 27,420
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles27.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos