Topic summary
89%204 analyzed articles/videos192,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 85,440 hits. Analysis detected 821,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 842,902 analyzed words across 204 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,386 of 21,637 topics). This Foreign Policy is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score204 analyzed articles842.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Extremist Michigan Imam Who Hosted El-Sayed Urges Followers To Turn Out To Vote and 'Deal the Zionist a Blow,' Frames Primary as Epic Fight Against 'Puppet' of Israel76%
The Washington Free Beacon93%By Chuck Ross93%8/3/2026, 3:00:37 PM
Five months of war with Iran48%
Vox67%By Cameron Peters69%8/3/2026, 2:40:00 PM
Get The Flock Out: Young Libertarians Have A Message For Establishment Politicians30%
The Daily Caller80%By Ireland Owens76%8/3/2026, 12:43:39 PM
Exclusive: U.S. Military Asks Troops For ‘Creative And Unconventional’ Ideas To Punish Iran25%
The Seattle Medium65%By Seattle Medium57%8/3/2026, 8:45:00 AM
'Trump feels stuck': Unusual move said to be latest sign that Iran war 'not working well'83%
Raw Story96%By Travis Gettys95%8/3/2026, 5:55:55 AM
‘I’m Not Looking to Kill People’: Trump Declares Iran Peace Deal Is ‘Imminent’71%
Mediaite82%By Sean James83%8/2/2026, 4:10:17 PM
Trump says he’s holding off strikes on Iran, citing possible new deal71%
Human Events89%By Roberto Wakerell-Cruz64%8/2/2026, 9:00:00 AM
Readers sound off on state education failures, the Fauci inquiry and TV chefs68%
New York Daily News86%By Voice of the People87%8/2/2026, 12:00:08 AM
Trump says Gulf leaders’ input weighed heavily in decision to hold off on ordering new Iran strikes20%
Baltimore Sun32%By Associated Press73%8/1/2026, 9:09:13 PM
Trump's 'odd' Camp David visit a telling — and troubling — sign: biographer74%
Raw Story96%By Alexander Willis95%8/1/2026, 5:59:04 PM