Author summary
69%6 analyzed articles/videos1,789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Peters results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,455 hits. Analysis detected 9,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,182 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (4,677 of 8,520 authors). This Cameron Peters is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Cameron Peters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
46%Cameron Peters (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,182
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate