Publication summary
86% 16 analyzed articles/videos 5,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Events results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 3,433 hits . Analysis detected 28,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,797 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (175 of 550 publications). This Human Events is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 25,797
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst