Author summary
74% 12 analyzed articles/videos 4,762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberto Wakerell-Cruz results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 2,019 hits . Analysis detected 21,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,790 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,701 of 8,882 authors). This Roberto Wakerell-Cruz is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Roberto Wakerell-Cruz
Author details
Total words: 20,790
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score12 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst